|
Manchester, New Hampshire Northern New England Presbytery, PCUSA |
|
Manchester First Presbyterian Church |


|
To contact us: |
|
Sermons |
|
They say “politics and religion
don't mix.” I say this campaign can't stop talking about religion. They say
“separation of church and state.” I say politicians sure been preaching a lot
of sermons lately. You might be able to separate the state from the church
but you sure can’t separate the politician from the pulpit. They say, “I’m
not going to force my values on others.” I say, what is faith without
values?
|
|
Separation of who’s church and who’s state? |
October 31, 2004Luke 19:1-10 |
|
WHO YOU GONNA VOTE FOR? |
|
ILLUSTRATION A man on vacation was strolling along outside his hotel in Acapulco, enjoying the sunny Mexican weather. He heard the screams of a woman kneeling in front of a child. The man knew enough Spanish to determine that the boy had swallowed a coin. Seizing the child by the heels, the man held him up, gave him a few shakes, and an American quarter dropped to the sidewalk. “Oh, thank you sir!” cried the woman. “You seemed to know just how to get it out of him. Are you a doctor?” “No, ma’am,” replied the man. “I’m with the Internal Revenue Service.”
This was Zacchaeus. A shake down artist. He could get the last quarter out of you.
Now it’s Tuesday morning for Zacchaeus and he has to walk in the election booth and pull the lever. He is either going to stand for the state or for a life of faith. He is either going to vote for himself of for those he has defrauded. He will either continue with Rome or make a change for Christ. Come Election Day, the day Zacchaeus was called down out of that tree, he had to make a choice. Let’s put it in Tuesday’s language: He has to cast his vote. Who will he vote for? First, he could… Vote for the Tax Collectors He could decide to continue
his life as it always had been. This way he would retain his wealth, but what
would it cost him in the end? Nothing in first century Judea was quite so
hated and despised as was the Roman tax. It not only reminded the Jews that
they were a subjugated people; it also represented a theological affront. To
the Jew there was only one King, and that was God, not Caesar. Paying tribute
to an earthly non-Jewish monarch was something that the Hebrews had opposed
throughout their long history. |
|
ILLUSTRATION - There was a little boy who got separated from his parents in a large shopping center. The Security Department quickly located the child, and took him to an office while the frantic parents were paged over the public address. One of the security guards got a large ice cream cone for the boy, so when his parents arrived at the office, there was their little son happily eating his ice cream. |
|
Suddenly, as his parents embraced him, the child burst into tears. One of the security guards said, “Gosh, I guess he didn’t know he was lost until he was found!” Zacchaeus was like that.
In many ways Zacchaeus was as poor as any man in Jericho.
For all of his money he was a lonely man, he was an empty man. In the world
of the flesh he had everything; in the world of the spirit he had nothing.
Man’s biggest problem is that when he has lost his
relationship with God, his relationship with all others will go wrong.
Or, he could follow his heart and.. Vote for Jesus The
master’s presence at his dinner table pricked his conscience. He had opened
his home to the Christ and now Christ has opened his heart to his sins. And
what were his sins? He had regularly cheated the people he tasked, stole from
them, and perhaps lied to the state on how much he had collected. But perhaps
worse than his miscalculations was his disregard for the poor. Luke tells us
that Zacchaeus stood up at some point during the meal and announced to his
guest, “Look, Lord! Here and now I give half my possessions to the poor, and
if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the
amount.”
That is why I think the point of the Zacchaeus
story is not that we must get rid of our wealth. We certainly should use it
for good, as much and as often as we can. Nor do I think the point of this
story is that Jesus only cares for and saves the poor. Isn’t Jesus after all
eating at the home of one of the wealthiest men of that community. The point
of the story is Zacchaeus’ face to face encounter with the Christ. Zacchaeus
does not become an illustration for the evil of money or the righteousness of
the poor. Zacchaeus is a model for repentance, for turning our lives around,
for righting the wrongs we have committed. It is a story of Jesus’ love for
the rich man and the poor.
Zacchaeus, being of short stature, could not
see for the press of the crowd. So he climbed into a tree to get a better
view. His inaccessibility to Jesus was more than literal, it was also
symbolic. It is hard to know what drove Zacchaeus to turn on his kinsmen.
Desire for power, love of money, revenge upon Jewish leadership, or just
plain greed. He could have been blocked in so many ways.
Yes, Jesus went to be the guest of a sinner and thank God he did. For if he had not we would not know him as savior today. This is a story of the saving act of God. Jesus said there is more joy in heaven over one repentant sinner than ninety-nine people who think that they need no repentance. Zacchaeus, come down, I’m going home with you today.
And now a most remarkable thing happened. Faith instantly
transformed into works. “Half of all that I have I give to the poor,”
exclaimed Zacchaeus. He didn’t give 10% he gave 50%. Oh, easy for him to do,
you say, he was a wealthy man. Well, Jesus once told of a poor widow who
entered the temple and didn’t give 50% but l00%. She gave all that she had.
No tear jerking, emotional appeal here. Zacchaeus was a genuinely changed
man. The Law said to give 10% but Zacchaeus wanted to go beyond that. It’s
what Jesus called the second mile.
|

